North East councils praised for waste savings

by / Thursday, 04 December 2014 / Published in Latest News

In the face of budget pressures, local authorities in North East England have managed to make substantial savings and even improve services, according to a report from an organisation backed by HM Treasury.

The study, by Local Partnerships which is owned by the Treasury and the Local Government Association, is the third regional study by the organisation into local authorities and waste services.

The work, supported by CIWM North East, details how the 12 authorities in the North East, all with responsibility for both waste collection and disposal services, have delivered waste efficiencies.

The report says: “In all cases not only have savings been realised but services have been maintained or improved upon. There is evidence of strong partnership working, both formally and on an ad hoc basis. In addition virtually all authorities are open to the possibility of further engagement and joint working if the opportunities arise.”


On partnership working, the study finds that set up and integration costs for merging services are modest “with less than a two year payback period for all the shared services analysed”.

John Enright, project leader and head of joint working at Local Partnerships said: “The North East report follows on from those which Local Partnerships have already produced on the West Midlands and London. What all these reports highlight is the innovative approach of authorities as they balance the need to deliver efficiencies while protecting public services.

“With the help of officers and members, we have put these studies together so that others may learn from their experiences, as well as explain why changes have and indeed will continue to be made. Last month we launched the fourth report covering the Yorkshire & Humber and already we have received some excellent studies that once again demonstrate that in this industry, you never stop learning.”


Most of the collection services in the region are run in-house and the report is seen as showing that whether public services are contracted or in-house, local authorities are challenging their activities to ensure that the tax-payer is getting value for money with “nothing set in stone”.

The study goes into detail and is also seen as being of particular use to local authorities who are reviewing their services and considering partnership working. Among the positive findings in the report was the success of work to reconfigure rounds and optimise routes as well make changes to services, specifically in terms of number or types of vehicles and receptacles used in collection or the frequency of collection.


Also featured in the report was how authorities were maximising recycling and recovery to increase payloads and reduce associated disposal costs as well as maximising income from recyclable materials to ensure the most financial benefit can be realised.

The report pays close attention to the financial benefits of changes to services and from joint working. For example, Northumberland looked at maximising income from dry recyclables. A fit for purpose market testing process was agreed with the contractor and also the council financed additional labour at the MRF to maximise material capture. As a result an additional £541,000 was received by Northumberland following the first recyclables service market testing review.

The authorities in the Tees Valley Waste Partnership successfully worked together on a contract covering Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Jointly the five authorities’ worked through the North East Procurement Organisation (NEPO).

The report notes: “When the existing contract term was due to end there was a lack of clarity on what the Government would require of any future WEEE service so the Partnership collectively took advice as to the best way forward. This gave the Partnership confidence to extend the contract beyond its agreed end to allow them time to incorporate any new initiatives from Government. Savings were made not only on procurement costs, but a competitive gate fee and attractive financial support from Valpak (the contract winners) were other benefits for the Partnership.”


A third example is how Darlington saved £1 million following an agreement with its contractor Wades, with the contractor agreeing to freeze the gate fees on the contract at 2010/11 prices for the following two years. Local Partnerships says the council has a “proactive positive relationship with the contractor” which has resulted in a number of efficiencies being identified and delivered.

Past reports have covered Dorset, East Kent, London, East Sussex, Hertfordshire and Lichfield & Tamworth.


Article taken from